Skip to content

USA Rockhounding

Explore · discover · respect

Near Me

FIELD LOCATION GUIDE

Glendive Short Pines — BLM Rockhounding Context, Montana: Status, Map & Field Guide

Montana · Dawson · Conditional

Glendive Short Pines — BLM Rockhounding Context

Quick answer

Glendive Short Pines — BLM Rockhounding Context is a Conditional rockhounding lead in Dawson, Montana. The recorded material or interest is Agates, common rocks and mineral specimens. The recorded manager or evidence context is Bureau of Land Management — Miles City Field Office. A condition remains unresolved before collecting. The recorded condition is: Active claims private rights current restrictions.

Conditionalcurrent status
Dawsoncounty / area
NoNear Me eligible
August 19, 2026last reviewed

What is Glendive Short Pines — BLM Rockhounding Context?

Glendive Short Pines — BLM Rockhounding Context is a Conditional rockhounding lead in Dawson, Montana. The recorded material or interest is Agates, common rocks and mineral specimens. The recorded manager or evidence context is Bureau of Land Management — Miles City Field Office.

What rocks, minerals, fossils or collecting interests are associated with it?

The record lists Agates, common rocks and mineral specimens. This description is tied to this atlas entry and should be read together with the access status below.

Can I collect at Glendive Short Pines — BLM Rockhounding Context?

Conditional. BLM verifies the exact 2,800-acre recreation site and warns against adjacent private-land trespass; current state tourism explicitly lists rockhounding there. Generic BLM casual-collection rules may apply only on eligible BLM ground, while active claims/private rights and current restrictions still require trip-day verification.

A condition remains unresolved before collecting. The recorded condition is: Active claims private rights current restrictions.

Condition to resolve: Active claims private rights current restrictions.

Where is this record located?

The atlas stores an exact public or official coordinate pair for this record. The coordinate identifies the mapped destination or access context described by the record; it does not expand permission beyond the documented activity.

Who manages the place or provides the evidence context?

The recorded manager or context is Bureau of Land Management — Miles City Field Office.

What evidence supports this status?

The record was last reviewed on 2026-08-19. Evidence and management context: Bureau of Land Management — Miles City Field Office. State-complete conditional page. Searchable, but not a collect-now recommendation until claim/private-right and current restriction checks are satisfied. Program or rule context: BLM_CASUAL_COLLECTION_RULES_SUBJECT_TO_CLAIMS_AND_SITE_RESTRICTIONS.

Program or rule context: BLM_CASUAL_COLLECTION_RULES_SUBJECT_TO_CLAIMS_AND_SITE_RESTRICTIONS

How precise is the map marker?

The atlas stores an exact public or official coordinate pair for this record. The coordinate identifies the mapped destination or access context described by the record; it does not expand permission beyond the documented activity.

What should I verify before going?

  • Current land ownership and the exact parcel or managed activity footprint.
  • Posted closures, seasonal restrictions, opening hours, fees and permit requirements.
  • Mining claims, mineral rights, private-property boundaries and road or trail access.
  • Whether the material and collecting method you intend to use are actually allowed.
  • Current safety conditions, including weather, fire, water, tides, unstable workings, traffic and other site-specific hazards.

When was this information last checked?

The recorded review date is August 19, 2026. Treat that date as the evidence snapshot used for this classification. Conditions can change after review, so field decisions should use the newest posted rules and manager information.

Is a map pin the same as collecting permission?

No. A map pin answers a navigation or geographic-context question. The status and evidence answer the permission question. Exact coordinates, public destination addresses and approximate county or regional context are deliberately kept separate so geographic precision is not confused with legal authority.

Field-use reminder: never infer collecting rights from proximity, a map marker or a geological occurrence. Verify the exact place, manager, current rule and collecting activity before removing material.