Washington · King · Research only
Tiger Mountain — Amber Occurrence Context
Tiger Mountain — Amber Occurrence Context is a research-focused rockhounding record for King, Washington. It is associated with Amber associated with coal deposits. The recorded research or management context is Washington DNR/WGS geotourism context. Use this entry to understand locality and geological context, then resolve the exact parcel, ownership, access, mineral rights, safety and removal authority before treating any occurrence as a collecting site.
What is Tiger Mountain — Amber Occurrence Context?
Tiger Mountain — Amber Occurrence Context is a research-focused rockhounding record for King, Washington. It is associated with Amber associated with coal deposits. The recorded research or management context is Washington DNR/WGS geotourism context.
What rocks, minerals, fossils or collecting interests are associated with it?
The record lists Amber associated with coal deposits. This description is tied to this atlas entry and should be read together with the access status below.
Can I collect at Tiger Mountain — Amber Occurrence Context?
Research only. Current WA100 material verifies amber occurrence and current DNR recreation context, but no site-specific recreational removal authorization or lawful collection footprint is established.
Use this entry to understand locality and geological context, then resolve the exact parcel, ownership, access, mineral rights, safety and removal authority before treating any occurrence as a collecting site.
Where is this record located?
The map uses named-place or King context for navigation. Resolve the exact site and current field authority before relying on the location for collecting decisions.
Who manages the place or provides the evidence context?
The recorded manager or context is Washington DNR/WGS geotourism context.
What evidence supports this status?
The record was last reviewed on 2026-08-19. Evidence and management context: Washington DNR/WGS geotourism context. Known high-value candidate is fully classified but intentionally withheld until the named blocker is resolved.
How precise is the map marker?
The map uses named-place or King context for navigation. Resolve the exact site and current field authority before relying on the location for collecting decisions.
What should I verify before going?
- Current land ownership and the exact parcel or managed activity footprint.
- Posted closures, seasonal restrictions, opening hours, fees and permit requirements.
- Mining claims, mineral rights, private-property boundaries and road or trail access.
- Whether the material and collecting method you intend to use are actually allowed.
- Current safety conditions, including weather, fire, water, tides, unstable workings, traffic and other site-specific hazards.
When was this information last checked?
The recorded review date is August 19, 2026. Treat that date as the evidence snapshot used for this classification. Conditions can change after review, so field decisions should use the newest posted rules and manager information.
Is a map pin the same as collecting permission?
No. A map pin answers a navigation or geographic-context question. The status and evidence answer the permission question. Exact coordinates, public destination addresses and approximate county or regional context are deliberately kept separate so geographic precision is not confused with legal authority.